Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality About the US Senate Malapportionment
ثبت نشده
چکیده
We analyze the relationship between senate malapportionment and the allocation of the US federal budget to the states during the period 1978-2002. A substantial literature originating from the influential paper by Atlas et al. (1995) finds that small and overrepresented states get significantly larger shares of federal funds. We show that these studies suffer from fundamental identification problems and grossly overestimate the impact of malapportionment. Most of the estimated impact is not a scale but a change effect. Rather than evidence of “small state advantage”, we find that states with fast growing population are penalized in the allocation of the federal budget independently of whether they are large or small. JEL codes: D72, H61, H77 keywords: federal budget, malapportionment, small state advantage, overrepresentation
منابع مشابه
Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality About the US Senate Malapportionment
We analyze the relationship between senate malapportionment and the allocation of the US federal budget to the states during the period 1978-2002. A substantial literature originating from the influential paper by Atlas et al. (1995) finds that small and overrepresented states get significantly larger shares of federal funds. We show that these studies suffer from fundamental identification pro...
متن کاملData contradict common perceptions about a controversial provision of the US Endangered Species Act.
Separating myth and reality is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of laws. Section 7 of the US Endangered Species Act (Act) directs federal agencies to help conserve threatened and endangered species, including by consulting with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service on actions the agencies authorize, fund, or carry out. Consultations ensure that ac...
متن کاملAdding Value? the Role of Second Chambers
In the study of legislatures, little attention is given to the second chambers of bicameral parliaments. We know something about some second chambers, most notably the US Senate, but relatively little is known about second chambers as a particular species of institution. To some extent, this is attributable to their perceived subordinate status. They are second chambers. In bicameral systems, r...
متن کاملDino P. Christenson
Previous scholarship argues that House members’ partisan relationship to the president is among the most important determinants of the share of federal dollars they bring home to their constituents. Do presidential politics also shape distributive outcomes in the Senate? Analyzing the allocation of more than $8.5 trillion of federal grants across the states from 1984 to 2008, we show that presi...
متن کاملThe Political Determinants of Federal Expenditure at the State Level
It has been shown that states with higher per capita senate representation have higher federal spending per capita (Atlas, C. M., Gilligan, T. A., Hendershott, R. J. and Zupan, M. A. (1995). American Economic Review 85: 624–629). With a more recent data sample, more highly disaggregated data and a different set of political control variables, we are able to confirm the main result of Atlas et a...
متن کامل